The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whoever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
Over 10 comments listed.
Printing out index only. |
Re: LinuxMedNews Project List
by Alvin Marcelo on Wednesday April 12, 2000 @ 11:07 AM
|
Great list Saint. I have a smaller list and I intended for it to be a "graphical map" showing the relationships of these projects to each other. It's at sourceforge: COSMOS
http://cosmos.sourceforge.net
|
[
Reply to this ]
|
Re: LinuxMedNews Open Source Medical Project List
by Erik Enge on Tuesday September 05, 2000 @ 02:09 AM
|
This link: http://www.mcis.duke.edu/standards/termcode/icd9cm.htm. To the ICD9 Codes is broken.
|
[
Reply to this ]
|
|
|
Re: LinuxMedNews Open Source Medical Project List
by yp on Sunday October 22, 2000 @ 05:43 AM
|
Interesting list but it fails to acknowledge the different contributions taken from OpenHealth or from http://homeusers.brutele.be/ypaindaveine/opensource/inventory.html or http://librehealth.sourceforge.net... How can you explain the presence of Prorec, Star, ... which are EU (European Union) projects, not really open source, but nevertheless interesting in a EU context?
|
[
Reply to this ]
|
|
|
Re: LinuxMedNews Open Source Medical Project List
by Mark Henigan D.O. on Saturday May 27, 2006 @ 02:14 AM
|
The link to the Open Source Medical Project List (http://www.linuxmednews.com/oprojects) is broken. Is the list available at any other URL?
Note that I use the operating system eComStation (eCS), a supported OEM version of IBM OS/2. Since there is a large community of OS/2-eCS users who are capable of porting Linux software, I hope to fill a void in the applications armory by using a suitable package written for Linux.
I practice Psychiatry, including Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, but don't want to limit the availability of such resources as dictionaries and templates by specialty. Any software suggestions will be welcomed.
I fully understand that Open Source doesn't mean free. However, the cost of most commercially available software for WinXX is scaled for medical groups rather than solo physicians. And, being based on M$ applications, it is generally stodgy and inflexible. I expect better prospects in the Linux world.
|
[
Reply to this ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The following
comments are owned by whoever posted them.
( Reply )
|
